|
|
|
Grammar and Usage Pitfalls
Modifiers
To avoid modifier mistakes:
Place limiting modifiers next to the word they
modify. Limiting modifiers are words like only, even, almost, nearly, and just.
-
Incorrect: The Joads almost end up with
nothing. This sentence suggests that they don’t end up with
nothing—that they almost do but ultimately do not.
-
Correct: The Joads end up with almost
nothing. The meaning changes when the limiting modifier is placed
correctly: now it’s clear that the Joads do indeed end up with very
little.
Make sure modifiers are clear and placed correctly. Always place modifiers close to the word(s) they
modify and be sure that what they modify is
clear.
-
Misplaced: Rose of Sharon dreams about her future
in the truck. This sentence implies that Rose of Sharon is
happy about the possibility of remaining in the truck.
-
Correct: In the truck, Rose of Sharon dreams
about her future. This revision makes clear that Rose of
Sharon has dreams that go beyond the truck’s interior.
Beware of dangling modifiers. A modifier dangles when it fails to refer logically to any word in the
sentence. Dangling modifiers usually appear at the beginning of a sentence and
often include the present participle form of a verb (a verb ending with -ing).
Any time you see a word ending in -ing at the beginning of a sentence, be sure
it’s modifying what it’s supposed to.
-
Dangling: Hoping to reach California, the old
truck was driven down the dusty roads by the Joads. In this
sentence, it appears that Hoping to reach California modifies the old
truck—yet it seems unlikely that the truck itself was hoping
anything.
-
Fixed: There are two ways to fix a sentence
that has a dangling modifier:
-
Name the actor in the subject:
Hoping to reach California, the Joads drove
the old truck down the dusty roads.
-
Change the modifier into a phrase that names the
actor:
Since the Joads hoped to reach California,
they drove the old truck down the dusty roads.
Eliminate the passive voice from your writing and you’ll find far fewer
dangling modifiers in your work. When you use
passive voice, you take away the actor—and a dangling modifier often results
from an actor being absent.
Paralellism
A sentence that contains two or more ideas or details must present those ideas
or details in the same fashion or in a balanced
way. This practice is called parallelism.
The following sentences are careful to maintain parallelism:
-
Neither Connie nor Rose of Sharon knew what the
future would hold. Here, the words that fall after
the neither and nor both are nouns.
-
The Joads worked hard, remained hopeful, and
tried to stay together even when their luck was running
out. Here, each item in the list is a verb in the past participle
form.
Sentences that contain lists are common sites for parallelism problems. To fix
such sentences, make sure that you phrase all the items in a list so that they are the same part of speech:
-
Incorrect: Rose of Sharon wanted a house, a car,
and going to the movies whenever she wanted. In this
sentence, two of the items in the list (house and car) are nouns, and
one is a participial phrase (going to the movies . . .)
-
Correct: Rose of Sharon wanted a house, a car,
and money to use for the movies whenever she wanted. This
sentence fixes the parallelism problem by making all three items in the
list nouns (house, car, and money).
“Hopefully”
The word hopefully is an adverb that means “in a hopeful manner.” In
conversational English, however, we commonly use hopefully to mean “I hope that.” In
formal essay writing, this usage is incorrect.
In written English, hopefully is an example of
a disjunct—a word that breaks into a sentence and exposes
the writer’s personal feelings on the content of the sentence.
-
-
Incorrect: Hopefully, the mother will
give in and buy the girl the doll. This sentence
implies that the writer holds a personal hope that the mother
will buy the girl the doll.
-
Corrected: At the toy store, the girl
looked up at her mother hopefully. This sentence
clarifies that the girl, not the writer, is the one who is
expressing hope.
Gendered Language
Whenever possible, avoid gendered language in your
writing.
-
-
You may risk alienating readers if you use the use the
masculine pronouns he, him, and his to represent both
sexes.
-
At the same time, avoid using the feminine
pronouns sheand her simply to “make a statement”—this can be jarring for
your readers.
-
Similarly, don’t try to avoid the issue by using the
third-person plural pronoun their—that can create a
pronoun/antecedent agreement problem.
-
To refer to third-person singular subjects or objects when gender is
unclear, use the phrases he or she, him or her, or his or hers.
Alternatively, change third-person singular subjects or objects to plural
and use they, them, their, or theirs.
-
Grammatically incorrect: A writer should do
research before writing their essay.
-
Grammatically correct but gendered: A writer
should do research before writing his essay.
-
Better: A writer should do research before
writing his or her essay.
-
Best: Writers should do research before writing
their essays.
|
NEED A STUDY BREAK?
Check out SparkLife for the latest on TV, movies, music, and more.
Go now...
YOUR COLLEGE FIT
Our SparkCollege personality quiz determines your best college fit.
Take it now...
SAT VOCAB NOVELS
Fast and fun. Master SAT vocab words while you read our latest novel.
Read one now...
SAT COUNTDOWN
...until the next SAT on October 4th!
SAT Word-A-Day
abjure (v.) to reject, renounce. "To prove his honesty, the President abjured
the evil policies of his wicked predecessor."
Get this on your cell phone...
|